HIRE QA ENGINEERS

Find QA Engineers Who Prevent Bugs, Not Just Find Them

Evaluate testing strategy, automation skills, and quality advocacy with structured assessments designed for QA and SDET hiring.

Start Free Assessment Download Question Bank

The Hiring Challenge

QA engineers are your quality gate. A great QA engineer prevents bugs from reaching production by building the right testing strategy. A poor one finds bugs after the fact and creates an adversarial relationship with developers.

The problem: QA interviews often test manual testing scenarios or automation tool knowledge. Neither predicts whether someone can design a testing strategy that actually improves quality.

Common Hiring Mistakes

Testing tool knowledge, not strategy

Knowing Selenium doesn’t mean knowing what to test.

Ignoring collaboration skills

QA engineers who can’t work with developers create friction, not quality.

Overweighting bug-finding

The best QA engineers prevent bugs. Bug-finding is a trailing indicator.

Skipping process thinking

Quality is a process, not an activity. Testing strategy matters more than test execution.

Evaluation Framework

What LayersRank Evaluates

Technical Dimension

40%

Test Automation

Automation framework design
Test pyramid understanding
CI/CD integration

Testing Strategy

Risk-based testing approach
Test coverage analysis
Exploratory testing methodology

Technical Depth

API testing
Performance testing awareness
Security testing basics

Behavioral Dimension

35%

Quality Advocacy

Shifting quality left
Influencing development practices
Building quality culture

Collaboration

Working with developers on testability
Cross-functional communication
Managing release readiness

Problem-Solving

Root cause analysis
Reproducing intermittent issues
Debugging complex scenarios

Contextual Dimension

25%

Process Orientation

Testing in agile workflows
Continuous testing mindset
Metrics-driven quality improvement

Sample Questions

Sample Assessment Questions

technical

You’re joining a team that has no automated tests. Design a testing strategy for a new feature they’re about to ship.

What this reveals: Testing strategy thinking, prioritization of test types, pragmatic approach to test coverage.

technical

You have 2 days before a major release and the test suite takes 8 hours to run. How do you prioritize what to test?

What this reveals: Risk-based testing thinking, prioritization under pressure, understanding of test pyramid.

technical

Walk me through how you would automate a test suite for a REST API with 50 endpoints.

What this reveals: Automation strategy, framework thinking, understanding of API testing patterns.

behavioral

Tell me about a time you found a critical bug close to release. How did you communicate it?

What this reveals: Communication under pressure, risk assessment, stakeholder management.

behavioral

Describe a disagreement with a developer about whether something was a bug. How did you resolve it?

What this reveals: Collaboration skills, ability to advocate for quality without creating conflict.

Get All 50 Questions →

Evaluation Criteria

What separates strong candidates from weak ones across each competency.

Competency	What Great Looks Like	Red Flags
Testing Strategy	Risk-based approach, appropriate test pyramid, pragmatic coverage	Tests everything equally, no prioritization, only manual testing
Automation	Maintainable frameworks, integrated with CI/CD, focused on value	Brittle tests, automating for the sake of it, no CI integration
Quality Advocacy	Shifts left, influences development practices, builds quality culture	Gatekeeper mentality, adversarial with developers
Communication	Clear bug reports, risk communication, release readiness assessment	Unclear reports, doesn’t communicate risk, blocks releases without rationale
Problem-Solving	Systematic root cause analysis, reproduces complex issues	Surface-level bug reporting, can’t reproduce intermittent issues

Testing Strategy

Great: Risk-based approach, appropriate test pyramid, pragmatic coverage

Red flags: Tests everything equally, no prioritization, only manual testing

Automation

Great: Maintainable frameworks, integrated with CI/CD, focused on value

Red flags: Brittle tests, automating for the sake of it, no CI integration

Quality Advocacy

Great: Shifts left, influences development practices, builds quality culture

Red flags: Gatekeeper mentality, adversarial with developers

Communication

Great: Clear bug reports, risk communication, release readiness assessment

Red flags: Unclear reports, doesn’t communicate risk, blocks releases without rationale

Problem-Solving

Great: Systematic root cause analysis, reproduces complex issues

Red flags: Surface-level bug reporting, can’t reproduce intermittent issues

How It Works

Configure your QA assessment

Use our template or customize for your testing needs

Invite candidates

They complete the assessment async (35-45 min)

Review reports

See scores with confidence intervals across all dimensions

Make better decisions

Know exactly where to probe in final rounds

Time to first assessment: under 10 minutes

Pricing

Plan	Per Assessment	Best For
Starter	₹2,500	Hiring 1-5 QA engineers
Growth	₹1,800	Hiring 5-20 QA engineers
Enterprise	Custom	Hiring 20+ QA engineers

Start Free Trial — 5 assessments included

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does the QA assessment take?

35-45 minutes. Covers testing strategy, automation scenarios, and behavioral questions.

Does it assess manual and automation testing?

Yes. Both are important. You can adjust weights based on whether you need a manual QA, SDET, or hybrid role.

Can it assess SDET roles specifically?

Yes. Increase the weight on automation and technical depth dimensions for SDET hiring.

Can we see the questions before inviting candidates?

Yes. Full preview available after signup.

Related Resources

50 Behavioral Interview Questions →Hiring Scorecard Template →ROI Calculator →

Ready to Hire Better?

5 assessments free. No credit card. See the difference structured evaluation makes.

Start Free Trial Talk to Sales